<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overcomplexity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andybrandt.net/576/overcomplexity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andybrandt.net/576/overcomplexity</link>
	<description>A stream in the sea...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:33:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sneer</title>
		<link>http://www.andybrandt.net/576/overcomplexity/comment-page-1#comment-58319</link>
		<dc:creator>sneer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andybrandt.net/?p=576#comment-58319</guid>
		<description>development of humankind is far ahead computer systems complexity. And, I guess, humans solved the problem of overcomplexity some time ago. 
If assumed, the corporation is a huge brain that deals with other brains (huge and small), we could see specialization: divisions, departments and so on. If you go deeply to the clerk who sits behind blue screen of a computer, you will realize easily, his work is very simple, his decisions are not very significant and may not destroy the whole brain. The substitution of this specialized application may be done easily, as well its development. And so on...

This is how, computer aided systems probably will go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>development of humankind is far ahead computer systems complexity. And, I guess, humans solved the problem of overcomplexity some time ago.<br />
If assumed, the corporation is a huge brain that deals with other brains (huge and small), we could see specialization: divisions, departments and so on. If you go deeply to the clerk who sits behind blue screen of a computer, you will realize easily, his work is very simple, his decisions are not very significant and may not destroy the whole brain. The substitution of this specialized application may be done easily, as well its development. And so on&#8230;</p>
<p>This is how, computer aided systems probably will go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pstradomski</title>
		<link>http://www.andybrandt.net/576/overcomplexity/comment-page-1#comment-58311</link>
		<dc:creator>pstradomski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andybrandt.net/?p=576#comment-58311</guid>
		<description>This analysis might interest you:
http://www.berglas.org/Articles/ImportantThatSoftwareFails/ImportantThatSoftwareFails.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This analysis might interest you:<br />
<a href="http://www.berglas.org/Articles/ImportantThatSoftwareFails/ImportantThatSoftwareFails.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.berglas.org/Articles/ImportantThatSoftwareFails/ImportantThatSoftwareFails.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

